Stability is no bargain. A lump sum invested for 25 or 30 years in a less wiggly portfolio might only grow to half as much as a more effective portfolio that embraces that longer time horizon. The longer we can tolerate volatility, the better off we may be.
Want content like this in your inbox each week? Leave your email here.
It’s good fun to watch small children at play, using their imagination – they might be pirates or princesses, or serving imaginary meals, or having conversations with stuffed animals.
What is not good fun are financial types who pretend that so-called “market-linked” products actually provide exposure to real investment market returns. Often, a formula used to determine returns pays only a fraction of percentage gains, puts a maximum limit on returns, and ignores the effect of dividends. That’s investing only in the same sense that talking to a teddy bear is actual conversation*.
There is another common form of make-believe in the investment world. Some pretend that one might sharply limit the ups-and-downs in an account, yet still reap stock market returns, through some special strategy or tactic. Our view is that this is pandering. Long term investing is about willingness to accept a certain amount of risk in pursuit of getting paid.
Both of these fantasies play on the natural human desire for stability. But lower volatility may come at a cost of lower returns or higher costs. By the time the investor figures out there is either less stability than expected, or lower returns, a lot of freight may have been paid. Skip the make-believe, keep it real.
Clients, not everyone agrees with us – we hold contrarian views. If you would like to talk about this or anything else, please email us or call.
*The opinions voiced in this material are for general information only and are not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations for any individual.
You must be logged in to post a comment.